Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:16 pm
Scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have developed glass that won't fog up, doesn't produce any glare, cleans itself, and needs to be on all of our smartphones immediately.
The researchers created multifunctional glass with surface nanotextures that "virtually eliminates reflections, producing glass that is almost unrecognizable because of its absence of glare—and whose surface causes water droplets to bounce right off, like tiny rubber balls," according to MIT News.
Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:18 pm
dementon wrote:Will Your Next Smartphone Have Super-Science Wonder Glass?Scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have developed glass that won't fog up, doesn't produce any glare, cleans itself, and needs to be on all of our smartphones immediately.
The researchers created multifunctional glass with surface nanotextures that "virtually eliminates reflections, producing glass that is almost unrecognizable because of its absence of glare—and whose surface causes water droplets to bounce right off, like tiny rubber balls," according to MIT News.
Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:23 pm
Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:44 pm
gcruse wrote:dementon wrote:Will Your Next Smartphone Have Super-Science Wonder Glass?Scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have developed glass that won't fog up, doesn't produce any glare, cleans itself, and needs to be on all of our smartphones immediately.
The researchers created multifunctional glass with surface nanotextures that "virtually eliminates reflections, producing glass that is almost unrecognizable because of its absence of glare—and whose surface causes water droplets to bounce right off, like tiny rubber balls," according to MIT News.
Screw that. I want my spectacles made of it.
Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:47 pm
Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:29 pm
Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:30 pm
Yep. An old joke went about the development of new shoes which were so advanced that they [by themselves] were jumping on the feet of the wearer. And then it turned out that the new shoes cost more than a motorcycle, and were ruined by any contact with dust or dampness.Ichneumon wrote:...and shatters if you look at it sideways, probably.
The first and foremost attribute of cellphone glass is strength and durability.
That array of glass "spikes" looks as if it would easily crack between the columns, or soon have the spikes toppled if it gets gouged by a fingernail or keys/coins in your pocket.
Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:54 pm
Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:59 pm
View under the polarized light. Or put a polarifilter on your eyeglasses.narby wrote:It might perhaps be too fragile for cell phone glass. But it might make awesome glass over other LCD type screens, such as in airline cockpits and such. Getting rid of reflection has always been the killer for daylight readable displays. If you put a nasty filter over it, the resulting images is often blurry and dark. And without, it's got too much reflection.
Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:09 pm
GSlob wrote:View under the polarized light. Or put a polarifilter on your eyeglasses.narby wrote:It might perhaps be too fragile for cell phone glass. But it might make awesome glass over other LCD type screens, such as in airline cockpits and such. Getting rid of reflection has always been the killer for daylight readable displays. If you put a nasty filter over it, the resulting images is often blurry and dark. And without, it's got too much reflection.
Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:24 pm
narby wrote:GSlob wrote:View under the polarized light. Or put a polarifilter on your eyeglasses.narby wrote:It might perhaps be too fragile for cell phone glass. But it might make awesome glass over other LCD type screens, such as in airline cockpits and such. Getting rid of reflection has always been the killer for daylight readable displays. If you put a nasty filter over it, the resulting images is often blurry and dark. And without, it's got too much reflection.
There is an entire industry built around these filters. I'm not an expert on it, but I know a few, and there isn't an easy/cheap/good solution.
Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:29 pm
submicron glass fibers are rather flexible. But the easiest use for polarifilters is to put them on the light sources, and then adjust.doc30 wrote:narby wrote:GSlob wrote:View under the polarized light. Or put a polarifilter on your eyeglasses.narby wrote:It might perhaps be too fragile for cell phone glass. But it might make awesome glass over other LCD type screens, such as in airline cockpits and such. Getting rid of reflection has always been the killer for daylight readable displays. If you put a nasty filter over it, the resulting images is often blurry and dark. And without, it's got too much reflection.
There is an entire industry built around these filters. I'm not an expert on it, but I know a few, and there isn't an easy/cheap/good solution.
And polarized filters only work for transmitted light and only when the polarizing filter is optimally aligned.
That being said, inexpensive, low glare options do exist, at least with with respect to vacuum deposited thin films.
Those columns might fair better if they were polymeric, like the roll on roll production method speculated in the article. If polymeric, they would be far more flexible than glass columns. They could bend and recover rather than break. It would only be a matter of using a material with the right loss modulus.
Tue May 01, 2012 1:00 am
GSlob wrote:submicron glass fibers are rather flexible. But the easiest use for polarifilters is to put them on the light sources, and then adjust.doc30 wrote:narby wrote:GSlob wrote:View under the polarized light. Or put a polarifilter on your eyeglasses.narby wrote:It might perhaps be too fragile for cell phone glass. But it might make awesome glass over other LCD type screens, such as in airline cockpits and such. Getting rid of reflection has always been the killer for daylight readable displays. If you put a nasty filter over it, the resulting images is often blurry and dark. And without, it's got too much reflection.
There is an entire industry built around these filters. I'm not an expert on it, but I know a few, and there isn't an easy/cheap/good solution.
And polarized filters only work for transmitted light and only when the polarizing filter is optimally aligned.
That being said, inexpensive, low glare options do exist, at least with with respect to vacuum deposited thin films.
Those columns might fair better if they were polymeric, like the roll on roll production method speculated in the article. If polymeric, they would be far more flexible than glass columns. They could bend and recover rather than break. It would only be a matter of using a material with the right loss modulus.
Tue May 01, 2012 1:12 am
the local farmers, even in brazil or in china, use windows. Their indoors light source, for all intents and purposes, is a window - and that could be fitted with a polarifilter. Fitting a lamp with a polarifilter is even easier.narby wrote:GSlob wrote:submicron glass fibers are rather flexible. But the easiest use for polarifilters is to put them on the light sources, and then adjust.
Light source in our case is the sun.
Installation is done by the local farmer. In brazil. Or china.
There there are solutions, but all of them are compromises.
Tue May 01, 2012 5:51 am
Tue May 01, 2012 11:39 am
doc30 wrote:whys polarize the light source? Reflected light is naturally polarized. The idea is to reduce glare. Wearing polarized sunglasses will help with respect to instrument panel glare. Adding antireflective coatings would add an order of magnitude improvement.
Tue May 01, 2012 3:42 pm
Wed May 02, 2012 10:10 pm
Wed May 02, 2012 10:13 pm
Do not bother with optical cable. Direct telepathy. And as for the polarization of reflected light - yes, if it is reflected from the non- [or weakly] conductive surfaces. That's why the metal things [like coins] lying on the ground glint differently from the, say, pieces of glass or plastic. This property could be used rather impressively when locating such coins under very limited light conditions [dusk, or even nighttime under city lights].radioastronomer wrote:doc30 wrote:whys polarize the light source? Reflected light is naturally polarized. The idea is to reduce glare. Wearing polarized sunglasses will help with respect to instrument panel glare. Adding antireflective coatings would add an order of magnitude improvement.
I think a direct optical cable "brain to device" link would work best but I think that tech is still a wee bit down the road.
Wed May 02, 2012 10:55 pm
radioastronomer wrote:I think a direct optical cable "brain to device" link would work best but I think that tech is still a wee bit down the road.
Thu May 03, 2012 3:10 am
doc30 wrote:whys polarize the light source? Reflected light is naturally polarized. The idea is to reduce glare. Wearing polarized sunglasses will help with respect to instrument panel glare. Adding antireflective coatings would add an order of magnitude improvement.