Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 12:22 pm

Gumlegs wrote:Relax, friends. The NYT poll has been denounced as "biased."

No kidding.

This isn't he first time the Obama campaign complained of methodology problems in polls that looked bad for the president. In April, David Axelrod complained that a Gallup poll showing Romney leading Obama was "saddled with some methodological problems."


Holy shit.

It's not even June, and they're making flop-sweat by the fucking TON!

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 1:05 pm

Cobalt Shiva wrote:
Gumlegs wrote:Relax, friends. The NYT poll has been denounced as "biased."

No kidding.

This isn't he first time the Obama campaign complained of methodology problems in polls that looked bad for the president. In April, David Axelrod complained that a Gallup poll showing Romney leading Obama was "saddled with some methodological problems."


Holy shit.

It's not even June, and they're making flop-sweat by the fucking TON!


It's just the administrations way of sending a message to the media they need to get their house back in order. Accidentally letting factual information slip into their coverage won't be tolerated.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 5:37 pm

In New Hampshire, Nero +12, (Registered Voters), 53-41.

New Hampshire is supposed to be in play, but this poll seems to say otherwise.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 6:39 pm

what the hell is "flop-sweat"?

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 6:40 pm

In Wisconsin, Nero +1 (Registered Voters), 47-46

Promising - Note Left Wing Poll.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 6:40 pm

kingprout wrote:what the hell is "flop-sweat"?

Theatrical term. It's the sweat a performer feels when he's failing (or "flopping"), in front of an audience.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 6:41 pm

kingprout wrote:what the hell is "flop-sweat"?

It's what Albert Brooks got when he did the news on camera in Broadcast News.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 7:05 pm

ah.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 7:20 pm

gcruse wrote:
kingprout wrote:what the hell is "flop-sweat"?

It's what Albert Brooks got when he did the news on camera in Broadcast News.

Sadly, that was 25 years ago. Time flies.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 7:31 pm

jlogajan wrote:
gcruse wrote:
kingprout wrote:what the hell is "flop-sweat"?

It's what Albert Brooks got when he did the news on camera in Broadcast News.

Sadly, that was 25 years ago. Time flies.

The culture hasn't changed much in the last fifty years. The fifty years before that, though, mama mia.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 8:01 pm

furball4paws wrote:In Wisconsin, Nero +1 (Registered Voters), 47-46

Promising - Note Left Wing Poll.


Walker's success and union overreach may be opening doors for Romney in Wisconsin.

The poll trends may be closer to those of 2000 and 2004. Those were close GOP wins - and I'll take any sort of win.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 8:04 pm

hchutch wrote:
furball4paws wrote:In Wisconsin, Nero +1 (Registered Voters), 47-46

Promising - Note Left Wing Poll.


Walker's success and union overreach may be opening doors for Romney in Wisconsin.

The poll trends may be closer to those of 2000 and 2004. Those were close GOP wins - and I'll take any sort of win.
obaa is incredibly polarizing, and that should tell on the election. When rummaging through my memory of american history [the natives, please correct me!], the only more polarizing president I can recall was lincoln.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 11:23 pm

GSlob wrote:
hchutch wrote:
furball4paws wrote:In Wisconsin, Nero +1 (Registered Voters), 47-46

Promising - Note Left Wing Poll.


Walker's success and union overreach may be opening doors for Romney in Wisconsin.

The poll trends may be closer to those of 2000 and 2004. Those were close GOP wins - and I'll take any sort of win.
obaa is incredibly polarizing, and that should tell on the election. When rummaging through my memory of american history [the natives, please correct me!], the only more polarizing president I can recall was lincoln.


Funny you should mention that. It feels like 1860 all over again.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Tue May 15, 2012 11:26 pm

Cobalt Shiva wrote:
Funny you should mention that. It feels like 1860 all over again.

I was saying the same thing to my slave this morning.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Wed May 16, 2012 6:18 am

gcruse wrote:
Cobalt Shiva wrote:
Funny you should mention that. It feels like 1860 all over again.

I was saying the same thing to my slave this morning.


You're a federal employee? :lol:

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Wed May 16, 2012 9:34 am

Republicans hold a seven-point lead on the Generic Congressional Ballot for the week ending Sunday, May 12. 

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 45% of Likely U.S. Voters would vote for the Republican in their district’s congressional race if the election were held today, while 38% would choose the Democrat instead. This gap is much larger than it has been for the past three weeks when Republicans led by three but is consistent with the level of support the GOP has been earning since early March.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... nal_ballot

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Wed May 16, 2012 10:07 am

Mitt Romney has moved out to an eight-point lead over President Obama in North Carolina after the two men were virtually tied a month ago.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in the Tar Heel State shows the putative Republican nominee earning 51% of the vote to Obama’s 43%. Two percent (2%) like some other candidate, and four percent (4%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

That’s a big change from last month when Romney posted a narrow 46% to 44% lead over the president in Rasmussen Reports’ first survey of the race in North Carolina.  Democrats have signaled North Carolina’s importance as a key swing state by deciding to hold their national convention in Charlotte this summer.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... _president

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Wed May 16, 2012 10:21 am

saganite wrote:Republicans hold a seven-point lead on the Generic Congressional Ballot for the week ending Sunday, May 12. 

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 45% of Likely U.S. Voters would vote for the Republican in their district’s congressional race if the election were held today, while 38% would choose the Democrat instead. This gap is much larger than it has been for the past three weeks when Republicans led by three but is consistent with the level of support the GOP has been earning since early March.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... nal_ballot


I wish Common Tator was around... he had such a wealth of knowledge on stuff like this.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Wed May 16, 2012 10:43 am

Cobalt Shiva wrote:
gcruse wrote:
Cobalt Shiva wrote:
Funny you should mention that. It feels like 1860 all over again.

I was saying the same thing to my slave this morning.


You're a federal employee? :lol:

Clearly not. "Slave" was singular.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Wed May 16, 2012 11:53 am

In New Jersey, Nero +10 (Registered Voters), 49-39.

Marginal for Nero at this point in time.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Wed May 16, 2012 12:21 pm

furball4paws wrote:In New Jersey, Nero +10 (Registered Voters), 49-39.

Marginal for Nero at this point in time.

You're kidding right?

Forget about New Jersey, New York, California, Massachusetts and Illinois. They are lost forever. Don't even bother paying attention.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Wed May 16, 2012 1:16 pm

Nilla wrote:
furball4paws wrote:In New Jersey, Nero +10 (Registered Voters), 49-39.

Marginal for Nero at this point in time.

You're kidding right?

Forget about New Jersey, New York, California, Massachusetts and Illinois. They are lost forever. Don't even bother paying attention.


Well, Nero isn't at 50% and should the electorate swing, that could pose problems for him, even in NJ. But I admit the chances are very small.

The presence of Christie and a tightening Senate race might just make things interesting.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Wed May 16, 2012 1:29 pm

furball4paws wrote:
Nilla wrote:
furball4paws wrote:In New Jersey, Nero +10 (Registered Voters), 49-39.

Marginal for Nero at this point in time.

You're kidding right?

Forget about New Jersey, New York, California, Massachusetts and Illinois. They are lost forever. Don't even bother paying attention.


Well, Nero isn't at 50% and should the electorate swing, that could pose problems for him, even in NJ. But I admit the chances are very small.

The presence of Christie and a tightening Senate race might just make things interesting.

If Romney wins NJ it will be a 54 state blowout.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Wed May 16, 2012 1:40 pm

saganite wrote:
furball4paws wrote:
Nilla wrote:
furball4paws wrote:In New Jersey, Nero +10 (Registered Voters), 49-39.

Marginal for Nero at this point in time.

You're kidding right?

Forget about New Jersey, New York, California, Massachusetts and Illinois. They are lost forever. Don't even bother paying attention.


Well, Nero isn't at 50% and should the electorate swing, that could pose problems for him, even in NJ. But I admit the chances are very small.

The presence of Christie and a tightening Senate race might just make things interesting.

If Romney wins NJ it will be a 54 state blowout.

... which leaves the three most populous for Teh Won.

Re: The Vastly Underimproved Poll Thread

Wed May 16, 2012 1:49 pm

furball4paws wrote:
Nilla wrote:
furball4paws wrote:In New Jersey, Nero +10 (Registered Voters), 49-39.

Marginal for Nero at this point in time.

You're kidding right?

Forget about New Jersey, New York, California, Massachusetts and Illinois. They are lost forever. Don't even bother paying attention.


Well, Nero isn't at 50% and should the electorate swing, that could pose problems for him, even in NJ. But I admit the chances are very small.

The presence of Christie and a tightening Senate race might just make things interesting.

That might restore my faith in the American people, but I will believe it when I see it. There are just too many zombies and drones around here.

Full Version