Tue May 15, 2012 12:22 pm
Gumlegs wrote:Relax, friends. The NYT poll has been denounced as "biased."
No kidding.This isn't he first time the Obama campaign complained of methodology problems in polls that looked bad for the president. In April, David Axelrod complained that a Gallup poll showing Romney leading Obama was "saddled with some methodological problems."
Tue May 15, 2012 1:05 pm
Cobalt Shiva wrote:Gumlegs wrote:Relax, friends. The NYT poll has been denounced as "biased."
No kidding.This isn't he first time the Obama campaign complained of methodology problems in polls that looked bad for the president. In April, David Axelrod complained that a Gallup poll showing Romney leading Obama was "saddled with some methodological problems."
Holy shit.
It's not even June, and they're making flop-sweat by the fucking TON!
Tue May 15, 2012 5:37 pm
Tue May 15, 2012 6:39 pm
Tue May 15, 2012 6:40 pm
Tue May 15, 2012 6:40 pm
kingprout wrote:what the hell is "flop-sweat"?
Tue May 15, 2012 6:41 pm
kingprout wrote:what the hell is "flop-sweat"?
Tue May 15, 2012 7:05 pm
Tue May 15, 2012 7:20 pm
gcruse wrote:kingprout wrote:what the hell is "flop-sweat"?
It's what Albert Brooks got when he did the news on camera in Broadcast News.
Tue May 15, 2012 7:31 pm
jlogajan wrote:gcruse wrote:kingprout wrote:what the hell is "flop-sweat"?
It's what Albert Brooks got when he did the news on camera in Broadcast News.
Sadly, that was 25 years ago. Time flies.
Tue May 15, 2012 8:01 pm
furball4paws wrote:In Wisconsin, Nero +1 (Registered Voters), 47-46
Promising - Note Left Wing Poll.
Tue May 15, 2012 8:04 pm
obaa is incredibly polarizing, and that should tell on the election. When rummaging through my memory of american history [the natives, please correct me!], the only more polarizing president I can recall was lincoln.hchutch wrote:furball4paws wrote:In Wisconsin, Nero +1 (Registered Voters), 47-46
Promising - Note Left Wing Poll.
Walker's success and union overreach may be opening doors for Romney in Wisconsin.
The poll trends may be closer to those of 2000 and 2004. Those were close GOP wins - and I'll take any sort of win.
Tue May 15, 2012 11:23 pm
GSlob wrote:obaa is incredibly polarizing, and that should tell on the election. When rummaging through my memory of american history [the natives, please correct me!], the only more polarizing president I can recall was lincoln.hchutch wrote:furball4paws wrote:In Wisconsin, Nero +1 (Registered Voters), 47-46
Promising - Note Left Wing Poll.
Walker's success and union overreach may be opening doors for Romney in Wisconsin.
The poll trends may be closer to those of 2000 and 2004. Those were close GOP wins - and I'll take any sort of win.
Tue May 15, 2012 11:26 pm
Cobalt Shiva wrote:
Funny you should mention that. It feels like 1860 all over again.
Wed May 16, 2012 6:18 am
gcruse wrote:Cobalt Shiva wrote:
Funny you should mention that. It feels like 1860 all over again.
I was saying the same thing to my slave this morning.
Wed May 16, 2012 9:34 am
Wed May 16, 2012 10:07 am
Wed May 16, 2012 10:21 am
saganite wrote:Republicans hold a seven-point lead on the Generic Congressional Ballot for the week ending Sunday, May 12.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 45% of Likely U.S. Voters would vote for the Republican in their district’s congressional race if the election were held today, while 38% would choose the Democrat instead. This gap is much larger than it has been for the past three weeks when Republicans led by three but is consistent with the level of support the GOP has been earning since early March.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... nal_ballot
Wed May 16, 2012 10:43 am
Cobalt Shiva wrote:gcruse wrote:Cobalt Shiva wrote:
Funny you should mention that. It feels like 1860 all over again.
I was saying the same thing to my slave this morning.
You're a federal employee?
Wed May 16, 2012 11:53 am
Wed May 16, 2012 12:21 pm
furball4paws wrote:In New Jersey, Nero +10 (Registered Voters), 49-39.
Marginal for Nero at this point in time.
Wed May 16, 2012 1:16 pm
Nilla wrote:furball4paws wrote:In New Jersey, Nero +10 (Registered Voters), 49-39.
Marginal for Nero at this point in time.
You're kidding right?
Forget about New Jersey, New York, California, Massachusetts and Illinois. They are lost forever. Don't even bother paying attention.
Wed May 16, 2012 1:29 pm
furball4paws wrote:Nilla wrote:furball4paws wrote:In New Jersey, Nero +10 (Registered Voters), 49-39.
Marginal for Nero at this point in time.
You're kidding right?
Forget about New Jersey, New York, California, Massachusetts and Illinois. They are lost forever. Don't even bother paying attention.
Well, Nero isn't at 50% and should the electorate swing, that could pose problems for him, even in NJ. But I admit the chances are very small.
The presence of Christie and a tightening Senate race might just make things interesting.
Wed May 16, 2012 1:40 pm
saganite wrote:furball4paws wrote:Nilla wrote:furball4paws wrote:In New Jersey, Nero +10 (Registered Voters), 49-39.
Marginal for Nero at this point in time.
You're kidding right?
Forget about New Jersey, New York, California, Massachusetts and Illinois. They are lost forever. Don't even bother paying attention.
Well, Nero isn't at 50% and should the electorate swing, that could pose problems for him, even in NJ. But I admit the chances are very small.
The presence of Christie and a tightening Senate race might just make things interesting.
If Romney wins NJ it will be a 54 state blowout.
Wed May 16, 2012 1:49 pm
furball4paws wrote:Nilla wrote:furball4paws wrote:In New Jersey, Nero +10 (Registered Voters), 49-39.
Marginal for Nero at this point in time.
You're kidding right?
Forget about New Jersey, New York, California, Massachusetts and Illinois. They are lost forever. Don't even bother paying attention.
Well, Nero isn't at 50% and should the electorate swing, that could pose problems for him, even in NJ. But I admit the chances are very small.
The presence of Christie and a tightening Senate race might just make things interesting.