Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:40 pm
... or MSNBC has their tongue firmly inserted into Obammy's anus. Just a thought ...furball4paws wrote:And now for the big WTF.
Rasmussen reports Nero's disapprove at a near record +9 (54-45 disapprove-approve, http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... ex_history ).
If he is that much disliked how can he be polling so well against the Republican hopefuls.
Could it be the quality of those hopefuls....?
Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:41 pm
furball4paws wrote:Rasmussen reports Nero's disapprove at a near record +9 (54-45 disapprove-approve,
If he is that much disliked how can he be polling so well against the Republican hopefuls.
Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:07 pm
furball4paws wrote:And now for the big WTF.
Rasmussen reports Nero's disapprove at a near record +9 (54-45 disapprove-approve, http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... ex_history ).
If he is that much disliked how can he be polling so well against the Republican hopefuls.
Could it be the quality of those hopefuls....?
Nah
Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:10 pm
jlogajan wrote:furball4paws wrote:Rasmussen reports Nero's disapprove at a near record +9 (54-45 disapprove-approve,
If he is that much disliked how can he be polling so well against the Republican hopefuls.
Rassy polls likely voters. You have to read the other polls details to find out if they screen for that. Some include registered voters. And some include all adults.
Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:10 pm
hchutch wrote:furball4paws wrote:And now for the big WTF.
Rasmussen reports Nero's disapprove at a near record +9 (54-45 disapprove-approve, http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... ex_history ).
If he is that much disliked how can he be polling so well against the Republican hopefuls.
Could it be the quality of those hopefuls....?
Nah
He's only +@ on Romney, and at his approval level (45-43). He's at +4 for Santorum, and 1 point above his approval (46-42). The trend is looking good as well - Obama's down a bit from last week.
IT may just be the GOP primary kinda holding things down. But keep in mind... Obama's not in good shape. He's an incumbent, he's had the benefit of the distraction over Slutgate, and he's only getting 45% in a head-to-head matchup with Romney, and 46% against Santorum?
Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:54 pm
furball4paws wrote:hchutch wrote:furball4paws wrote:And now for the big WTF.
Rasmussen reports Nero's disapprove at a near record +9 (54-45 disapprove-approve, http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... ex_history ).
If he is that much disliked how can he be polling so well against the Republican hopefuls.
Could it be the quality of those hopefuls....?
Nah
He's only +@ on Romney, and at his approval level (45-43). He's at +4 for Santorum, and 1 point above his approval (46-42). The trend is looking good as well - Obama's down a bit from last week.
IT may just be the GOP primary kinda holding things down. But keep in mind... Obama's not in good shape. He's an incumbent, he's had the benefit of the distraction over Slutgate, and he's only getting 45% in a head-to-head matchup with Romney, and 46% against Santorum?
Don't select, please. Nationally Nero is down 9 in approval. Nationally Nero is up 2-4 (Rasmussen) over Santorum and Romney and Paul, more over Gingrich.
BUT, in swing states that the Republicans must win, he beats every one of them and is at or near 50% in every one. So, what trend are you looking at?
Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:09 pm
Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:20 am
Smashing Young Man wrote:Again, I want to get these primaries over and see how Gary Johnson polls (see my new avatar). Has there ever been this much disgust with both major parties going into an election in modern history? I think the time is prime for a third party contender.
Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:47 am
Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:44 pm
furball4paws wrote:Today, nationally:
Nero v Romney - 48-42, Nero +6
Nero v Santorum - 48-41, Nero +7
So much for Hutch's hopeful trens. National polls are not much good, only polls in the battlegrounds are important and as of this post, they don't look good for any Republican.
"We are dead".
Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:31 pm
hchutch wrote:I think a Romney-Santorum
Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:36 pm
gcruse wrote:hchutch wrote:I think a Romney-Santorum
I don't know if I can hold my nose that tightly.
Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:14 pm
gcruse wrote:hchutch wrote:I think a Romney-Santorum
I don't know if I can hold my nose that tightly.
Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:09 pm
Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:31 pm
Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:44 pm
Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:52 am
furball4paws wrote:More important, Rasmussen shows Nero's disapprove at +10 - I don't remember it ever being that high.
But, not to throw cold water on the party, someone point me to a poll that shows any Republican beating Nero in any of the battleground states with the possible exception of Florida. Then I'll celebrate.
Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:15 pm
Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:51 pm
Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:23 pm
Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:47 pm
furball4paws wrote:Poll numbers for your edification:
PA Santorum +14
NC Romney +4
TX Santorum +8
Pennsylvania is sort of proportional. North Carolina is proportional. Texas is proportional.
In Florida (Nero at 45.5 average)
Nero v Romney - Nero +3
Nero v Santorum - Nero +2
In Pennsylvania (Nero at 47, average)
Nero v Romney - Nero +6
Nero v Santorum - Nero +1
Nero v Gingrich - Nero +13
Nero v Paul - Nero +5
In North Carolina (Nero at 49 average)
Nero v Romney - Nero +3
Nero v Santorum - Nero +5
Nero v Gingrich - Nero +9
Nero v Paul - Nero +7
The state numbers are disturbing, since these states must be in play for any Republican to win.
Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:59 pm
furball4paws wrote:Poll numbers for your edification:
PA Santorum +14
NC Romney +4
TX Santorum +8
Pennsylvania is sort of proportional. North Carolina is proportional. Texas is proportional.
In Florida (Nero at 45.5 average)
Nero v Romney - Nero +3
Nero v Santorum - Nero +2
In Pennsylvania (Nero at 47, average)
Nero v Romney - Nero +6
Nero v Santorum - Nero +1
Nero v Gingrich - Nero +13
Nero v Paul - Nero +5
In North Carolina (Nero at 49 average)
Nero v Romney - Nero +3
Nero v Santorum - Nero +5
Nero v Gingrich - Nero +9
Nero v Paul - Nero +7
The state numbers are disturbing, since these states must be in play for any Republican to win.
Thu Mar 15, 2012 6:09 pm
saganite wrote:furball4paws wrote:Poll numbers for your edification:
PA Santorum +14
NC Romney +4
TX Santorum +8
Pennsylvania is sort of proportional. North Carolina is proportional. Texas is proportional.
In Florida (Nero at 45.5 average)
Nero v Romney - Nero +3
Nero v Santorum - Nero +2
In Pennsylvania (Nero at 47, average)
Nero v Romney - Nero +6
Nero v Santorum - Nero +1
Nero v Gingrich - Nero +13
Nero v Paul - Nero +5
In North Carolina (Nero at 49 average)
Nero v Romney - Nero +3
Nero v Santorum - Nero +5
Nero v Gingrich - Nero +9
Nero v Paul - Nero +7
The state numbers are disturbing, since these states must be in play for any Republican to win.
Are those numbers based on likely voters, registered voters or adults?
Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:08 am
furball4paws wrote:saganite wrote:furball4paws wrote:Poll numbers for your edification:
PA Santorum +14
NC Romney +4
TX Santorum +8
Pennsylvania is sort of proportional. North Carolina is proportional. Texas is proportional.
In Florida (Nero at 45.5 average)
Nero v Romney - Nero +3
Nero v Santorum - Nero +2
In Pennsylvania (Nero at 47, average)
Nero v Romney - Nero +6
Nero v Santorum - Nero +1
Nero v Gingrich - Nero +13
Nero v Paul - Nero +5
In North Carolina (Nero at 49 average)
Nero v Romney - Nero +3
Nero v Santorum - Nero +5
Nero v Gingrich - Nero +9
Nero v Paul - Nero +7
The state numbers are disturbing, since these states must be in play for any Republican to win.
Are those numbers based on likely voters, registered voters or adults?
FL numbers, Rasmussen, LV
PA and NC, RV. At this point in time I don't think it's worth rooting through the details to look for glimmers of hope. Senor Slob is right, once there is a Rep candidate, these numbers will take some kind of a bounce/sag, depending
Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:24 pm